Saturday, 14 March 2026

Community Fitness: Are We Missing the Biggest Opportunity?

People sometimes see me criticising the building of expensive new leisure centres and assume that I am against them.

That simply isn’t true.

In fact, many leisure trust facilities are fantastic. They deliver vital services, they support communities that might otherwise have no access to sport or fitness, and they produce some incredible outcomes for public health.

My issue isn’t with the facilities themselves.

My concern is that local government may be missing an enormous opportunity to build something much more powerful around them.

The Facilities Are Great. The Strategy Often Isn’t.

Across the UK, local authorities are investing significant sums of money into new leisure infrastructure.

It’s not uncommon to see £25 million, £30 million or even £50 million invested into new leisure centres.

And when they open, they can be impressive.

But bricks and mortar alone don’t solve the real problem.

The real challenge is participation.

According to Sport England data, only around 17 percent of the UK population are members of a fitness facility.

That means more than four out of five people are not engaging with gyms or leisure centres at all.

For an industry that plays such an important role in physical and mental wellbeing, that number should concern all of us.

Because it means the vast majority of the population still isn’t being reached.

The Private Sector Is Being Overlooked

Where I believe we are missing a trick is in how local authorities approach community health and fitness.

If we can find tens of millions of pounds to build these incredible facilities, why can we not allocate even five percent of that investment toward creating a truly integrated community health strategy?

One that includes the private sector as part of the solution.

Across the country there are thousands of independent gyms, studios and health businesses delivering fantastic services.

They already have:

Facilities
Staff
Expertise
Established communities

Yet very rarely are they included in broader community health initiatives.

Instead, the sectors often operate in isolation from one another.

Commercial Pressure Is a Real Barrier

Of course, it’s important to recognise that private clubs operate under very different conditions.

Commercial gyms face pressures that public facilities do not.

They must cover rent, staff, equipment finance, utilities and marketing costs every single month.

This creates risk.

Taking part in community health initiatives can feel like a financial gamble if the outcomes are uncertain.

Which is why any integrated strategy must recognise the commercial reality of private operators and create models that allow them to participate without putting their businesses at risk.

The Industry’s Own Mindset Needs to Change

But we also have to be honest with ourselves.

Sometimes the barriers are not just structural. They are cultural.

The private fitness industry can be relentlessly competitive.

Constant offers.
Discount wars.
Little collaboration between neighbouring clubs.

Every gym trying to win the same customers from each other.

Imagine instead if more clubs focused on growing the market rather than fighting over it.

If we could move overall engagement from 17 percent to 25 percent, or even 30 percent, the growth across the entire industry would be extraordinary.

There would be more members for everyone.

More opportunities.

More impact.

Why Central Government Isn’t the Starting Point

Whenever the fitness industry talks about change, the conversation usually turns toward central government and the NHS.

We campaign for tax relief.
We campaign for business rate reform.
We talk about partnerships with the NHS.

Those conversations are important.

But in my view they are not where real change will start.

Central government is like a massive oil tanker.

Turning it takes years.

The NHS is under extraordinary pressure financially and operationally. Fitness, however important it is, simply doesn’t sit high enough on their priority list.

And even when central government does make decisions, implementation almost always happens at a local level through commissioning groups and regional authorities.

Even DCMS themselves acknowledge that many of these decisions are ultimately local.

Which is why we need to start there.

Where Real Change Can Begin

The real opportunity lies with:

Local authorities
Sport England
Local health departments
Community partnerships
National Lottery funding streams

These organisations already control funding, programmes and community initiatives.

But private fitness businesses should not be standing outside those conversations.

They should be inside them.

Because if the goal is better health outcomes, then surely the focus should be on all of the resources available in a community, not just those owned by the council.

Prove the Impact First

Before we ask for national support or government intervention, we need to do something else first.

We need to prove our value.

That means showing measurable outcomes.

Participation improvements.
Retention improvements.
Health improvements.
Community engagement.

If the industry can demonstrate genuine, measurable impact, the conversation with government becomes much easier.

Evidence changes everything.

A Call for Cooperation

Right now we have pockets of incredible work happening across the UK.

Brilliant leisure centres.
Innovative private clubs.
Community initiatives that genuinely change lives.

But they often operate independently.

Imagine what could happen if they worked together.

Public and private sector clubs aligned around a shared goal.

Raising participation.
Improving health outcomes.
Building stronger communities.

Because 17 percent participation simply isn’t good enough.

If we truly want to change the nation’s health, that number needs to move closer to 25 or even 30 percent.

And the only way we get there is through cooperation.

The facilities already exist.

The expertise already exists.

The passion certainly exists.

Now we just need the strategy to bring it all together.

Wednesday, 11 March 2026

What Is the Biggest Threat to a Gym’s Success?

Most gym owners believe the biggest threats to their business are external.

Competition.
Equipment quality.
Technology.
The size of the facility.

But after working with gyms across the UK for many years, it becomes clear that the biggest threats are rarely what owners think they are.

Before we explore what actually damages a gym’s performance, it’s worth starting with what doesn’t.

Because many operators spend a huge amount of time, energy and money worrying about the wrong things.

What It Isn’t

The Brand or Cost of Your Equipment

Gym owners often become obsessed with equipment brands.

Technogym.
Life Fitness.
Matrix.
Hammer Strength.

But the reality is that for the vast majority of members, the brand on the side of a machine is almost meaningless.

Most members simply want equipment that:

Works properly
Is clean
Is maintained
Does the job it is supposed to do

Outside of a very small group of enthusiasts, most members could not tell you the difference between major equipment manufacturers.

That knowledge largely exists in the minds of gym owners and industry professionals.

What does matter, however, is whether the equipment aligns with the brand and experience you are trying to create.

If you are positioning your gym as a boutique or premium training environment, then equipment needs to reflect that. The visual experience matters.

But if you are operating a mid-market or accessible community gym, investing heavily in ultra-premium equipment rarely produces a return.

Too often equipment decisions are driven by ego rather than strategy.

The Size of Your Gym

Another common belief is that bigger facilities automatically create more successful businesses.

In reality, larger spaces simply increase both opportunity and risk.

Yes, a larger gym may allow you to accommodate more members. But it also brings:

Higher rent
Larger equipment investment
Increased staffing costs
Greater utility bills
More debt and financial exposure

A bigger gym does not guarantee better performance.

Some of the most profitable gyms in the UK operate from relatively modest footprints because their systems, service and member engagement are exceptional.

Meanwhile, many large facilities struggle because the operational foundations are weak.

Bigger is not always better.
Sometimes it is simply bigger.

The Latest Technology

Technology has become one of the most common selling points in modern fitness clubs.

Apps.
Wearables.
Body composition scanners.
Member platforms.

And whilst these tools can certainly add value, their impact is often overestimated.

Across the industry, average gym app adoption rates sit below 30%. Even among those who download the app, regular engagement is often far lower.

The truth is that many members are impressed by technology during a tour, but once they start training they revert to simple behaviours.

They work out.
They leave.
They repeat.

This does not mean technology has no place in fitness clubs. But investing heavily in technology while neglecting the fundamentals of service and engagement is rarely a winning strategy.

Most members are not looking for more software.

They are looking for support, consistency and results.

So What Are the Real Threats?

In most gyms, the biggest risks to long-term success are internal rather than external.

And they are often surprisingly simple.

Poor Systems

Strong businesses run on strong systems.

Weak businesses rely on hope and good intentions.

Operational systems govern everything from how leads are followed up, to how members are welcomed, to how teams communicate and perform.

When systems are unclear or inconsistent:

Leads go cold
Members drift away
Staff improvise rather than deliver a consistent experience
Time and money are wasted

Well-designed systems do not make a gym robotic. They create clarity, efficiency and reliability.

They also free staff to focus on what matters most: delivering great service.

Without strong systems, even good teams struggle.

Untrained and Undermanaged Staff

Many gym owners believe that hiring good people is enough.

It isn’t.

Even the most capable employees cannot consistently deliver great service without training, guidance and clear expectations.

As a club owner or manager, you must decide:

What experience you want members to have
What behaviours you expect from staff
What standards define your brand

Then you must train your team to deliver those standards and manage them to maintain them.

Without that structure, staff naturally fall back on their own instincts and habits.

Sometimes those habits are excellent.

Often they are inconsistent.

One of the most uncomfortable conversations you can have with a struggling operator is this:

“What training has your team received?”

All too often, the answer is none.

Blaming staff without investing in their development is not leadership. It is abdication of responsibility.

No Real Focus on Member Engagement

One of the most overlooked areas of gym management is structured member engagement.

Many clubs assume that community happens naturally.

It rarely does.

The reality is that in every gym there are members who are confident, social and outgoing. These members naturally interact with staff and quickly become part of the culture.

But there is another group who behave very differently.

They arrive quietly.
They train quietly.
They leave quietly.

These members rarely ask questions. They rarely seek help. They rarely initiate conversations.

And because of that, they are often the ones who drift away unnoticed.

Engagement should not rely on personality.

It should be planned.

Successful gyms establish clear protocols for interaction and communication, ensuring members receive regular touchpoints that encourage participation, connection and support.

Because the members who need engagement the most are often the least likely to ask for it.

Not Understanding the Numbers

Perhaps the most dangerous weakness in many gyms is a lack of understanding around performance metrics.

Ask many operators how many members they signed up last month and they can answer immediately.

Ask them how many members they lost and the answer becomes far less certain.

Growth in a gym is not simply about new joins. In fact, the biggest performance issue in many clubs is not sales at all.

It is attrition.

Yet surprisingly, many gyms do not track attrition accurately, do not analyse it and do not set clear targets for improvement.

Even more concerning is the number of operators who run businesses without clearly defined performance targets at all.

Without measurement there is no clarity.

Without clarity there is no control.

And without control there is no sustainable growth.

The Real Difference Between Average and Exceptional Gyms

When you look closely at the most successful clubs in the industry, their advantage rarely comes from equipment, technology or size.

It comes from fundamentals.

Strong systems.
Well-trained teams.
Structured member engagement.
Clear performance tracking.

These are not glamorous topics. They do not make exciting marketing headlines.

But they are the foundations of a stable, profitable and resilient fitness business.

The uncomfortable reality is that when a gym struggles, the cause is often much closer to home than the owner would like to admit.

The question every operator should ask is simple:

Are the real threats to my business external…

Or are they internal?

Because once you understand that, improvement becomes far easier.

Monday, 2 March 2026

Are We Focusing on the Wrong People in Fitness?

For years, the fitness industry has faced the same two problems.

We either struggle to attract the majority of the population into our clubs, or we attract them and fail to keep them.

With more than 11 million people in the UK having previously been members of fitness clubs but no longer active, a number that exceeds current active membership, it is difficult to avoid one conclusion. Somewhere along the line, we are getting something wrong.

This is not a criticism of effort or intent. As an industry, we work hard. We innovate. We invest. We care.

But the results tell us that effort alone is not enough.

We’ve Become Very Good at Serving One Type of Person

The fitness industry has become exceptionally good at serving people who already love exercise.

Those who feel confident walking into a gym.
Those who understand the benefits.
Those who actively seek interaction, advice and progression.

For these people, our environments often work brilliantly.

The problem is that they represent only a fraction of the population.

If we want participation to grow meaningfully, we have to stop designing our clubs, messaging and systems primarily for people who are already bought in.

It may be time to focus on the other side of the coin.

The People We Are Not Reaching or Retaining

There is a large group of people who are not naturally drawn to fitness environments.

People who feel nervous about joining.
People who lack confidence.
People who do not fully understand the benefits of exercise.
People living with long-term illness, injury or health anxiety.
People who feel they do not belong.

These individuals are not lazy or uninterested. More often than not, they are unsure, intimidated or unconvinced that fitness spaces are built for them.

If we are honest, many clubs are not.

The First Challenge: Attraction

Our marketing needs to change.

Much of our messaging still assumes a level of confidence, motivation and understanding that many people simply do not have. We talk to those who already “get it”, rather than those who need reassurance, clarity and empathy.

If we want to attract this group, we need to:

Demystify fitness rather than glamorise it
Normalise nervousness instead of ignoring it
Talk about support, safety and progression, not just results
Show real people, not just confident regulars

Attraction should be about lowering barriers, not raising expectations.

The Second Challenge: Retention

Getting someone through the door is only the beginning.

For people who lack confidence or familiarity, the early weeks matter more than anything else. This is where many clubs lose them.

Our onboarding needs to improve.
Our monitoring and touchpoints need to be organised and deliberate.
Our follow-up needs to be proactive, not reactive.

These members do not need to be left alone to “figure it out”. They need to be guided.

In many cases, they need to be actively supported, reassured and checked in on. Not indefinitely, but intentionally. We need to babysit them early so that, over time, they can become part of the community.

Treating Different People the Same Is Not Equality

One of the biggest mistakes we make is treating all members the same.

Confident members seek interaction. They ask questions. They put themselves forward. As a result, they receive the most attention.

Less confident members do the opposite. They keep their heads down. They avoid conversation. They hope they are not noticed.

In many clubs, this means the people who need the most support receive the least.

Equality in fitness does not mean identical treatment.
It means appropriate treatment.

If we want better outcomes, we have to design systems that identify who needs more support and ensure they receive it without having to ask.

Building a Different Kind of Community

If we truly want to grow participation, we must stop designing clubs purely around those who already believe in what we do.

We need:

Better onboarding journeys
Clear, deliberate touchpoints
Structured check-ins
Staff trained to notice who is not engaging
A culture that values inclusion as much as performance

Community should not be something people have to earn. It should be something they are welcomed into.

A Final Thought

The future growth of fitness will not come from converting people who already love exercise.

It will come from supporting those who are unsure, nervous or unconvinced, and helping them feel safe, capable and included.

We have proven that we can serve the confident and committed.
Now we need to prove that we can serve everyone else.

If we can do that, participation will rise, retention will improve, and fitness will finally begin to reach the people who need it most.

Thursday, 26 February 2026

What If the Fitness Industry Stopped Competing on Price and Started Competing on Value?

Let’s be honest about something first.

Offers and price-led promotions are always going to exist. Clubs have bills to pay, teams to support and targets to hit. In the short term, dropping price works. It brings enquiries through the door and fills quieter periods.

The problem is not that price is used.
The problem is that price has become the default.

Over time, the fitness industry has trained the public to believe that gyms are cheap, interchangeable and disposable. Free months. Zero joining fees. Flash sales. Permanent discounts. Price has become the headline, not the experience, not the service, not the outcome.

And once price becomes the anchor, everything else loses its perceived value.

What If Clubs Worked Together Instead of Against Each Other?

Imagine a different approach.

Not price fixing. Not identical pricing. Not pretending every club is the same.

But a shared understanding across the sector that while price points may differ, the messaging does not need to be competitive or destructive.

Instead of “we’re cheaper than them”, the message becomes more collective and positive. This is what fitness gives you. This is why movement matters. This is how gyms improve lives. This is how to choose the right environment for you.

Clubs would still compete, but not on who can discount the hardest. They would compete on service standards, community, coaching quality and delivery.

That is a far healthier battleground.

Different Clubs Will Always Perform Differently and That’s Fine

Some clubs will outperform others. That’s reality.

They may be better located, better suited to a particular demographic, more premium, more community-driven or more specialised. That isn’t a failure of the market. That is choice.

The aim should not be to eliminate competition.
The aim should be to grow the total market.

Right now, only around 16.9 percent of the population engages with fitness clubs. That means more than 80 percent do not.

Imagine if that figure was 25 percent. Or 30 percent.

The opportunity for every operator would be enormous, without anyone needing to steal members from each other.

Competing on Value Changes the Conversation Completely

If the industry stopped shouting about price and started talking consistently about value, the conversation would shift almost immediately.

Customers would no longer choose purely on cost. They would compare clubs based on environment and culture, coaching and support, community and belonging, values and ethos, and how well a club fits their lifestyle.

Instead of asking “which is the cheapest?”, people would ask “which is right for me?”.

That single shift improves retention, results and long-term satisfaction.

The Impact on Businesses, Staff and Standards

When price stops being the primary lever, businesses gain breathing room.

Healthier margins allow clubs to reinvest in staff, improve facilities, add services, increase education and development, and deliver stronger member experiences.

Staff benefit too. Competing on price often squeezes wages, increases pressure and lowers expectations. Competing on value allows coaching, service and leadership to be treated as professions rather than commodities.

Standards rise across the board.

How This Changes External Perception of the Industry

A fragmented industry arguing over price is easy to ignore.

A united industry speaking positively about health, wellbeing, prevention and long-term outcomes is not.

If the sector presented a more consistent message, it would be far easier to defend gyms against rising costs and business rates, position fitness as part of the health solution rather than a luxury, gain credibility with local authorities, healthcare and government, and be taken seriously as a contributor to public wellbeing.

Messaging matters. And right now, ours is confused.

The Real Challenge

Price competition feels safe. It is immediate, measurable and familiar.

Positive, collective messaging requires confidence. It requires patience. It requires clubs to genuinely deliver on the promises they make.

It also requires a shift in mindset from short-term wins to long-term impact.

That is uncomfortable. But it is necessary.

A Better Future Is Possible

If the fitness industry stopped competing on price and started working together on positive messaging, the change would be far greater than most people expect.

We would grow participation.
We would improve standards.
We would retain members longer.
We would build stronger businesses.
We would elevate the profession.

The question is not whether it would work.

The question is whether we are willing to move beyond short-term tactics and build something better together.

Wednesday, 18 February 2026

Is The Fitness Industry Really Delivering the Health Outcomes We Claim?

Are We Really Delivering the Health Outcomes We Claim?

I had an interesting conversation recently with someone who works closely with our industry but sits just outside it. They’re not a gym owner. Not a trainer. Not a consultant. But they work alongside many fitness businesses and see how they operate day to day.

What struck me was how quickly the conversation landed on the same conclusions I’ve been talking about for years.

As an industry, we talk a great game about health.
But we don’t consistently deliver the outcomes we claim.

And when someone from outside the bubble says it out loud, it lands differently.

Let’s start with the uncomfortable facts.

Less than 17 percent of the population are members of a gym.
That means over 83 percent are choosing not to engage with what we offer.

Even more concerning, there are now more ex-members than current members in the fitness industry. Millions of people have tried our services and decided they weren’t for them.

That alone should force us to pause.

Yet we still measure success largely by member numbers. We celebrate openings, growth and headline figures, while ignoring what those numbers actually represent. Short stays. Early drop-outs. Cycles of joining and leaving.

If we were genuinely delivering on the health promises we make, those numbers would look very different.

Dig a little deeper and the cracks become clearer.

Many clubs do not track client journeys in any meaningful way. They don’t measure improvement, confidence, adherence or long-term behaviour change. They don’t even consistently monitor attendance beyond basic usage.

Most clubs still don’t have a structured onboarding process. No clear first 90 days. No defined checkpoints. No planned education or reassurance. Yet we confidently claim we “support” members.

How can we support people if we don’t guide them?

On top of that, many clubs don’t properly monitor their own business performance. Attrition, engagement, conversion, secondary spend, length of stay. Either not tracked at all, or looked at too infrequently to drive real decisions.

And yet, as an industry, we’re quick to position ourselves as the “first line of defence for the NHS”.

In reality, most of what we offer is access to facilities.

That doesn’t mean facilities aren’t valuable. They absolutely are. But facilities alone don’t change behaviour. They don’t build confidence. They don’t remove fear. And they don’t keep people engaged long enough to see real health outcomes.

To be clear, this isn’t an attack on every gym.

There are some outstanding operators out there. Clubs that genuinely care about service delivery. Businesses that prioritise onboarding, education, retention and long-term relationships. Operators who understand that fitness is about people, not programming.

They deserve huge credit.

But they are not yet the norm.

Too often we congratulate ourselves as an industry. We attend conferences, share success stories and talk about innovation, while avoiding the harder conversation about why the majority of the population still doesn’t feel that gyms are for them.

We’ve leaned heavily into hype and trends. HIIT. Six-week transformations. Challenges. Before-and-after photos. All of these have their place, but they are not the foundation of long-term engagement.

Exercise should not feel intimidating.
It should not feel competitive.
And it certainly shouldn’t feel like failure if someone doesn’t “stick to the plan”.

If we want to move the needle on engagement, we have to rethink how we deliver our services.

That means taking service delivery seriously. Designing real client journeys. Building onboarding that educates and reassures. Measuring success by retention, confidence and consistency, not just sign-ups.

It means recognising that health outcomes are built slowly, through trust, guidance and support, not through hype or intensity.

And it means being honest with ourselves.

If we want to be taken seriously as part of the health solution, we have to act like it. Not just talk about it.

This isn’t about blaming. It’s about responsibility.

If we genuinely believe fitness can change lives, then we need to do the work to make that true for more than just the already confident, already active minority.

Because if we keep doing what we’ve always done, we’ll keep getting the same results.

And the numbers already tell us that isn’t good enough.

Monday, 16 February 2026

Hotel Leisure Clubs: One of the Biggest Missed Opportunities in Fitness

Hotel leisure clubs sit in a unique position in the fitness industry.

They have strong locations.
High service standards.
Built-in footfall.
Premium facilities.
And access to audiences most gyms would love to attract.

Yet despite all of that, many hotel leisure clubs consistently underperform compared to their potential.

Not because the opportunity isn’t there.
But because of how leisure is positioned, prioritised and managed within the wider hotel business.

Why hotel leisure clubs should be winning

On paper, hotel leisure clubs have advantages most independent gyms can only dream of.

They are designed to high standards.
They operate within hospitality environments where service is already embedded.
They attract a non-intimidating mix of users: guests, members, spa users, corporate clients and local residents.
They are often seen as calm, welcoming and premium rather than aggressive or intimidating.

In many cases, hotel leisure clubs are not just gyms. They are mini health clubs. Pools, spas, studios, thermal areas, treatment rooms and social spaces all under one roof.

That should put them in an incredibly strong position.

So why do so many fail to truly capitalise on it?

Leisure is still viewed as a service, not a commercial asset

One of the biggest challenges is not operational. It’s cultural.

In many hotels, leisure is still treated as a guest amenity rather than a commercial driver. Something that supports room sales, rather than something that deserves its own performance focus.

Rooms, food and beverage, events and conferences are rightly measured relentlessly.
Leisure often isn’t.

When leisure is positioned as a service rather than a profit centre, a few things usually follow:

Limited commercial accountability
Conservative pricing decisions
Underdeveloped membership strategies
Little focus on conversion, yield or retention
Minimal investment in systems and sales capability

The result is a department that is busy, well-intentioned and liked by guests, but underperforming financially.

And the irony is, when leisure performs well, it lifts everything else around it.

Service-led environments can struggle with performance focus

Hospitality breeds excellent service standards. That is a huge strength.

But it can also create a reluctance to sell.

Many leisure teams are fantastic at welcoming, supporting and helping guests. They are less confident when it comes to conversations about membership, upgrades, PT, spa packages or long-term commitment.

Sales is often seen as something that might compromise service.

In reality, done properly, it enhances it.

Helping a guest or local member commit to a programme, routine or membership is not selling for the sake of revenue. It’s supporting outcomes, consistency and experience.

Without structure, leisure teams default to passive service. Friendly, helpful, but reactive.

And passive service rarely drives commercial performance.

Decision-making is often slow by design

Hotels are complex businesses. Layers of approval, brand standards, ownership structures and reporting lines all exist for good reason.

But they can slow innovation.

Pricing changes take time.
New programmes take time.
Marketing initiatives take time.
Local partnerships take time.

While independent gyms can test, adjust and move quickly, hotel leisure clubs often operate cautiously. That caution protects the brand, but it also means opportunities are missed.

Especially in local markets where agility matters.

Leisure often lacks its own clear strategy

Another common issue is the absence of a clear leisure-specific strategy.

Not a hotel strategy that includes leisure.
A leisure strategy in its own right.

That means clarity on:

Who the club is for locally
What success looks like commercially
How members, guests and spa users flow through the business
What the core revenue drivers actually are
How teams are measured and developed

Without this, leisure drifts. It reacts to demand instead of shaping it.

The opportunity hotels are sitting on

When leisure is positioned correctly, it becomes far more than a gym.

It becomes:

A driver of repeat stays
A differentiator for corporate contracts
A gateway to spa and wellness spend
A local community hub
A stable, recurring revenue stream
A brand amplifier rather than a cost centre

The best hotel leisure clubs prove this is possible. They combine hospitality-level service with fitness-industry performance thinking.

They don’t choose between service and sales. They align them.

What needs to change

Hotel leisure clubs don’t need radical reinvention. They need focus.

They need:

Clear commercial ownership of leisure performance
Confidence that selling well is part of great service
Simple, consistent systems for enquiries, onboarding and retention
Teams trained to support outcomes, not just access
Leadership that sees leisure as a strategic asset, not a support function

When that shift happens, the results can be transformational.

Not just for leisure.
For the entire hotel business.

Final thought

Hotel leisure clubs are not underperforming because they lack facilities, people or opportunity.

They underperform because they are often treated as something they are not.

They are not just a guest service.
They are not just an amenity.

They are one of the most underutilised commercial assets in hospitality.

And the hotels that recognise that will be the ones that lead the next phase of fitness and wellness growth.

Friday, 9 January 2026

Community Work and the Fitness Industry Should the Private Sector Be Doing More – and Can It Without Damaging Profit?

Community Work and the Fitness Industry

Should the Private Sector Be Doing More – and Can It Without Damaging Profit?

One of the most common justifications for public leisure centres receiving reduced tax status and ongoing funding is the community work they deliver.

And to be fair, many leisure centres do some genuinely good work.
They provide access to activity for older adults, support referral schemes, host community groups and offer initiatives that might not otherwise exist.

That deserves recognition.

But it also raises an important question.

Should community engagement be the sole domain of public leisure?
And if not, what role could the private fitness sector play without undermining its commercial sustainability?

Because the idea that community work and profitability are mutually exclusive is outdated.

The Private Sector Is Already Embedded in Communities

Private gyms are often:

Open longer hours
More flexible in programming
Faster to adapt
Deeply rooted in local neighbourhoods

Many already support communities informally. Sponsoring a local team. Helping a school fundraiser. Giving space to a charity event. Offering advice to someone who needs it.

But most of this work is unstructured, under-communicated and undervalued.

The opportunity now is to be more intentional.

Not to replicate public leisure.
But to complement it.

Community Initiatives That Don’t Destroy the Bottom Line

Community engagement does not have to mean free access for everyone or running at a loss.

Here are examples of initiatives private gyms can deliver with low financial impact and high community value.

Working with Local Charities

Partner with one or two local charities each year. Host fundraising events, awareness days or activity sessions. This builds trust, visibility and goodwill without ongoing cost.

Men’s and Women’s Support Groups

Offer space and light facilitation for mental health or support groups during off-peak hours. These groups value safe, neutral spaces and often lead to strong loyalty and advocacy.

Children’s Activities and Holiday Programmes

Short-term kids activity sessions, holiday clubs or school partnership programmes can run at break-even while introducing families to the facility and brand.

Blood Donation or Health Screening Events

Offering space for blood donation, health checks or mobile clinics brings footfall, credibility and positions the club as a health partner rather than just a gym.

First Aid and CPR Courses

Host paid or subsidised courses run by qualified providers. These are valuable to the community and can generate modest revenue while increasing engagement.

Daytime Studio Rental for Community Groups

Yoga groups, rehabilitation sessions, dance classes or local clubs often need space during off-peak hours. Renting studios at reduced daytime rates creates income from unused capacity.

GP and Health Referral Support

Working alongside GP referral schemes, social prescribers or wellbeing hubs can build long-term relationships and consistent attendance, even if margins are lower per head.

Targeted Community Discounts

Not blanket discounts, but structured programmes for:

Unemployed individuals
Disability groups
Carers
Veterans
These can be time-limited, capacity-controlled and supported by external funding or partnerships.

Supporting Local Schools

Offer talks, activity days, work experience, or access to facilities during quiet periods. This builds long-term trust with families and local authorities.

Free or Low-Cost Body Composition Testing

Open days offering free health checks or body analysis bring people through the door in a non-threatening way and create conversations rather than sales pressure.

Education Seminars and Workshops

Nutrition, sleep, movement, menopause, stress management, ageing well. These position the gym as a knowledge hub, not just a place to train.

Additional Opportunities Worth Considering

Coffee mornings or walking groups for older adults
Parent and toddler movement sessions
Post-natal support partnerships
Inclusive fitness days for disabled communities
Cultural or faith-based activity sessions
Collaboration with local employers on wellbeing initiatives

None of these require huge investment.
All of them create connection.

Examples of What’s Already Working

Across the UK, there are strong examples of private operators doing this well:

Independent gyms hosting daytime over-60s strength classes that later convert into paid memberships
Boutique studios partnering with charities for awareness months, increasing footfall and brand trust
Private clubs supporting social prescribing pathways and becoming recognised local health partners
Facilities opening unused studio space to community groups and generating income from what was previously dead time

These businesses didn’t lose money.
They gained relevance.

Why This Matters for Business, Not Just Community

Becoming a community hub creates tangible commercial benefits:

Trust and Credibility

People are far more likely to engage with a business they perceive as caring about more than profit.

Increased Reach Beyond the “17%”

Community initiatives introduce the gym to people who would never respond to traditional marketing.

Stronger Retention

Members are more loyal to businesses that feel embedded in their local area.

Better Staff Engagement

Teams take pride in working for a business that stands for something.

Reduced Reliance on Paid Marketing

Word of mouth and reputation become powerful drivers of growth.

New Partnerships and Funding Opportunities

Charities, employers, schools and health organisations open doors that pure commercial gyms rarely access.

The Bigger Opportunity

Public leisure should not be the only vehicle for community health.

Private gyms already deliver the majority of engagement, innovation and daily contact with members. The idea that social value implies financial loss is a false narrative.

Community engagement does not weaken a business.
When done well, it strengthens it.

The future is not public versus private.

It is collaboration, integration and shared responsibility.

Private fitness businesses that embrace this will not only support healthier communities, but will also build stronger, more resilient and more trusted brands.

And that is good for everyone.

The Psychology Behind Why Most People Still Do Not Join a Gym

Every January, the fitness industry gears up for growth.

Campaigns launch. Offers go live. Social feeds fill with motivation, transformation stories and fresh starts. And yet, beneath all of this activity sits a statistic we rarely confront honestly.

In the UK, fewer than 1 in 5 people are members of a gym.

That means more than 80% of the population still do not engage with our services, despite widespread awareness that being active improves health, confidence and quality of life.

So the real question is not why people cancel their memberships.

It’s why the majority never join in the first place.

And if we’re honest, much of the responsibility sits with us as an industry.

This is not a motivation problem. It is a psychology problem.

Most non-members are not anti-fitness.

They don’t wake up thinking, “I don’t want to feel better, live longer or have more energy.”

What they think is:

“I’ll feel stupid.”
“I won’t belong.”
“I won’t know what I’m doing.”
“Everyone will be fitter than me.”
“I’ll start and then fail again.”
“It’s not for people like me.”

These are not practical objections. They are emotional ones.

And gyms, often unintentionally, reinforce them.

Intimidation and fear of judgement are far more common than we admit

The fitness industry forgets how intimidating gyms can be because many of us are desensitised to them.

If you are carrying extra weight, self-conscious, new to exercise or returning after a long break, walking into a gym can feel like stepping onto a stage. Bright lights. Mirrors. Noise. People who look like they know exactly what they’re doing.

What’s important to recognise is that this isn’t just a beginner issue.

Even people who have been gym members before, or who have spent years working in the industry, can feel intimidated by certain gym environments.

I’ve worked in this industry for over 25 years. I understand how gyms work. I’ve trained in hundreds of facilities. And even I can walk into some gyms and immediately feel uncomfortable or out of place.

If that can happen to someone who knows the industry inside out, imagine how it feels for someone walking in from the outside. Someone who doesn’t understand the equipment, the culture, the unspoken rules or where they fit.

This isn’t weakness. It’s psychology.

And environment matters.

People don’t fear hard work. They fear embarrassment.

Most non-members are not afraid of exercise.

They are afraid of:

Doing something wrong
Being watched
Being corrected publicly
Feeling exposed
Looking foolish

Gyms are one of the few environments where adults are expected to perform physically, in public, without knowing the rules.

For many people, the safest option is not to enter at all.

A tour doesn’t fix this.
A welcome email doesn’t fix this.
A free trial often makes it worse.

Throwing someone into a space that confirms their fears is not onboarding. It’s proof that their internal story was right.

Belonging beats motivation every time

Humans are wired for belonging.

If people do not feel they belong somewhere, they will not stay. And in many cases, they won’t even start.

This is why leisure centres often see strong engagement among older adults during the daytime. The environment feels familiar, routine-driven and socially safe.

Private gyms can create the same sense of belonging, but many leave it to chance.

When “community” relies on confident members welcoming new ones, it excludes the very people who need support the most.

Belonging must be designed. It does not happen accidentally.

Safety and comfort are not optional extras

For many people, especially women, the question is not “Will this work?”

It’s “Will I feel safe?”

Lighting, layout, staff behaviour, tolerance of poor conduct, and how concerns are handled all shape perception. If someone feels uncomfortable or exposed, no amount of programming or technology will keep them.

If your environment does not actively communicate safety, warmth and respect, people will choose not to return.

Cost is rarely the real objection. Trust is.

Cost is often used as the reason people don’t join, but it’s usually not the truth.

People spend money on things they believe will work for them.

What non-members often believe is:
“I’ll join, go a few times, feel out of place, then cancel. I’ll waste money again.”

That is not a pricing problem. It’s a trust problem.

Access is what gyms sell. Outcomes are what people want.

And outcomes require guidance, reassurance and support.

We have normalised complexity and called it innovation

The industry loves innovation.

Apps. Wearables. Zones. Metrics. Programmes. Challenges. Integrations.

But complexity does not excite beginners. It paralyses them.

Choice overload leads to inaction.

Most people don’t join because they can’t answer one simple question:

“What do I actually do when I get there?”

If that answer is unclear, the safest decision is to do nothing.

Underrepresented groups remain under-served

If we want mass engagement, we must be honest about who we are not serving well.

This includes:

Older adults, especially those in their 60s and 70s
People with obesity or very low confidence
Those with long-term health conditions
Disabled people, including blind and deaf communities
People who have had negative gym experiences before
Communities where gym culture feels unfamiliar or exclusive
People who are nervous, anxious or overwhelmed

If only around 17% of the population uses gyms, we cannot claim we are the first line of defence for national health while designing services primarily for the confident minority.

This is our responsibility as an industry

If more than 80% of people do not engage with us, the issue is not personal motivation.

It is friction.

Too many gyms still rely on:

Self-confidence
Self-navigation
Self-education
Self-motivation

That works for the minority.

It fails the majority.

What needs to change if we want to reach the 83%

If we are serious about mass engagement, we need to redesign for real people, not ideal members.

That starts with:

Confidence-first onboarding

The first 30 to 90 days should reduce fear, not increase it. Clear guidance, check-ins and reassurance matter more than intensity.

Beginner pathways that feel normal

Not “beginner only” in a way that feels isolating, but clear starting points that remove uncertainty.

Staff trained in psychology, not just programming

Warmth, eye contact, reassurance and consistency reduce threat and build trust.

Language that reduces fear

Sell feelings, not physiques. Energy, confidence, sleep, movement and support matter more than results photos.

Environments built for inclusion

Design, signage, staff behaviour and culture must actively welcome those who feel least confident.

Intentional community building

Buddy systems, group starts, staff-led introductions and small wins create connection.

Measuring what actually matters

Track first 30-day attendance, early drop-off reasons, confidence levels and support interactions, not just leads and conversions.

The opportunity is enormous if we accept accountability

The fitness industry has huge potential to improve health, wellbeing and quality of life.

But that will not happen by serving the same 17% better.

It happens when we design for the people we have unintentionally excluded.

If we want to reach the 83%, we must stop blaming them for not joining and start asking a harder question:

What have we done to make joining feel safe, simple and genuinely for them?

Until we answer that honestly, the numbers won’t change.